1. Home
  2. ›Materials
  3. ›Photorefractive Effect

Photorefractive Effect

Light-induced refractive index changes via space-charge fields in electro-optic materials. Key for holographic storage, phase conjugation, and beam coupling.

Model: Textbook approximation

LiNbO₃ with e-polarized beams and the grating along c: r₃₃ = 30.8, r₁₃ = 8.6 pm/V, ε₃₃ = 28 (Weis & Gaylord 1985), n_o, n_e (Zelmon et al. 1997). N_eff depends on doping and is an input, not a material constant.

Grating period Λ = λ/(2 sin θ)

1.532 µm

E_D = E_q at Λ = 0.394 µm

Diffusion field E_D

104.3 kV/m

k_B T K / q

Trap-limited field E_q

1576 kV/m

q N_eff / (ε₀ ε_K K), ε_K = 28

Effective coefficient r_eff

30.18 pm/V

n = 2.2336, θ_in = 4.46°, fringe contrast cos 2θ_in included

Space-charge field E_sc (per unit m)

97.8 kV/m

E_D / (1 + E_D/E_q), a quarter period from the fringes

Index grating ½n³r_eff E_sc (per unit m)

1.645e-5

multiply by m = 2√(I₁I₂)/(I₁ + I₂); the polarization overlap is in r_eff

Two-beam coupling gain Γ

3.897 cm⁻¹

2π n³ r_eff E_sc / (λ cos θ_in); the c-axis sense sets which beam gains

Signal gain after L

6.975×

(1 + β_I)/(1 + β_I e^(−ΓL)), no absorption; e^(ΓL) = 7.017

Gain against crossing angle

Model

E_sc = E_D / (1 + E_D/E_q), Γ = 2π n³ r_eff E_sc / (λ cos θ)

Kukhtarev's band-transport model in steady state, with one carrier type, diffusion only (no applied field), small fringe modulation and no photovoltaic current. The grating is shifted a quarter period from the fringes, so the beams exchange energy: dI₁/dz = Γ I₁I₂/(I₁ + I₂).

Small angles give long periods and a weak diffusion field; large angles give short periods, where the trap density caps the field. Γ peaks near Λ = 2π√(ε₀ε_Kk_BT/(q²N_eff)).

n⁴r_eff = cos 2θ · cos β · [n_o⁴r₁₃(sin²β − sin²θ) + 2n_o²n_e²r₄₂ sin²β + n_e⁴r₃₃(cos²β − sin²θ)]

For e-polarized beams at ±θ inside, the grating couples them through ê₁·ε(R·K̂)ε·ê₂ times the fringe contrast ê₁·ê₂ = cos 2θ, and E_q uses the permittivity along K, ε_K = ε₁₁ sin²β + ε₃₃ cos²β (Feinberg et al. 1980). With K along c (β = 0, LiNbO₃) only r₃₃ and r₁₃ act. In BaTiO₃ a tilted grating brings in the large r₄₂, and r_eff peaks near β ≈ 53°, close to where r₄₂ sin²β cos β is largest. But ε₁₁ ≫ ε₃₃, so tilting K also lowers E_q: when the trap density limits the field (short periods, low N_eff), Γ peaks at a smaller β, down to β = 0. n is the e-index along the bisector; walk-off (≈ 1° in BaTiO₃) and anisotropic carrier mobility are neglected.

A grating's strain is neither zero nor free: its effective r and ε add piezoelectric and elasto-optic terms that depend on K (Zgonik et al. 1994). The clamped and unclamped BaTiO₃ sets are the two limiting cases, not the grating's own values. The r are 633 nm values used at every wavelength.

Fe:LiNbO₃ is dominated by its photovoltaic current, which this model leaves out: its diffusion gain is a lower bound. SBN and the sillenites (BSO, BGO) need the effective coefficient of their cut and polarization, so enter them as a custom crystal.

Model and references

Textbook approximation. A standard approximation from the literature (for example paraxial, plane-wave or Gaussian-beam), valid within the range the page states. About the tiers

Steady-state Kukhtarev diffusion grating, small m: E_sc = E_D/(1 + E_D/E_q), Γ = 2πn³r_eff E_sc/(λ cos θ). e-beams: Feinberg's tensor r_eff with cos 2θ contrast and ε along K. BaTiO₃ clamped and free sets as limits; no grating piezo/elasto-optic terms, walk-off, photovoltaic current or applied field.

  1. Kukhtarev N. V., Markov V. B., Odulov S. G., Soskin M. S., Vinetskii V. L. (1978). Holographic storage in electrooptic crystals. I. Steady state. Ferroelectrics 22, 949–960. doi:10.1080/00150197908239450
  2. Yeh P. (1989). Two-wave mixing in nonlinear media. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 25, 484–519. doi:10.1109/3.18564
  3. Feinberg J., Heiman D., Tanguay A. R. Jr., Hellwarth R. W. (1980). Photorefractive effects and light-induced charge migration in barium titanate. J. Appl. Phys. 51, 1297–1305. Eq. 7 (ε along K), eqs. 13 and 19 (tensor coupling of the two beams); the e-wave r_eff(β, θ) on this page is contracted from them. doi:10.1063/1.327824
  4. Zgonik M., Bernasconi P., Duelli M., Schlesser R., Günter P., Garrett M. H., Rytz D., Zhu Y., Wu X. (1994). Dielectric, elastic, piezoelectric, electro-optic, and elasto-optic tensors of BaTiO₃ crystals. Phys. Rev. B 50, 5941–5949. Table II (clamped r₁₃, r₃₃, r₄₂, ε₁₁, ε₃₃) and Table III (stress-free values), 633 nm, 23 °C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.50.5941
  5. Wemple S. H., DiDomenico M. Jr., Camlibel I. (1968). Dielectric and optical properties of melt-grown BaTiO₃. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 29, 1797–1803 (n_o, n_e single-oscillator fits, 0.4–0.7 µm, via the refractiveindex.info database). doi:10.1016/0022-3697(68)90164-9
  6. Weis R. S., Gaylord T. K. (1985). Lithium niobate: summary of physical properties and crystal structure. Appl. Phys. A 37, 191–203. doi:10.1007/BF00614817
  7. Zelmon D. E., Small D. L., Jundt D. (1997). Infrared corrected Sellmeier coefficients for congruently grown lithium niobate and 5 mol.% magnesium oxide–doped lithium niobate. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14, 3319. doi:10.1364/JOSAB.14.003319
Report a problem

A wrong value, a formula, a reference, or a page that misbehaves. The report includes this page and its current inputs.